FO° Debate: Is the Focus on ESG a Good or Bad Thing?

Check out our comment feature!

Talk of environmental, social and governance (ESG) is in the air. This is a term used by both companies and investors to signal that they are paying attention to sustainability, society and ethics.

The term itself is unclear. No one exactly knows what ESG means. Different people define it differently. Yet companies and investors use the term because it brings benefits.

Arguments for ESG

Companies can often sell more if they label themselves ESG. Customers these days want to make the world a better place and use their purchasing decision to do so. The argument for such use of ESG is simple: it benefits workers, society, the environment and companies themselves. 

For investors, the use of ESG helps them diversify their risk and invest in longer lasting stocks. This sort of investing could lead to a world without fossil fuels or plastics.

Arguments against ESG

Yet there are concerns about the use of the label ESG itself. It might not mean a lot. The term itself is inexact and companies self-report, leading to greenwashing. Companies often claim what they are not. The label itself is fake sometimes. This could lead to a culture of dishonesty and even fraud.

The use of the term ESG might actually make customers, companies or investors to believe that they are doing something significant whilst doing little or nothing at all. So, we could actually end up increasing the use of fossil fuels and plastic even as we spout pious ESG homilies.

What is the way forward?

Perhaps the ESG should not be such a catch-all phrase that includes women in leadership roles as well as saving polar bears. More precise goals and practices by companies might lead to much more progress than bandying the ESG term around.

There is also the possibility that ESG could be better defined over time. Standard metrics could evolve that actually give the term meaning and make it a useful term for customers, companies and investors.

The views expressed in this article/video are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Comment

0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

FO° Exclusive: Old Ghosts Come Roaring Back in New Germany

March 06, 2025

FO° Exclusive: The New US–Russia–Ukraine–Europe Soap Opera

March 04, 2025

FO° Exclusive: A More Volatile, Uncertain, Complex and Ambiguous World in 2025

March 01, 2025

FO° Talks: Sudan, a Regional Intractable Conflict

FO° Talks: A Reform UK Perspective on British Politics

February 19, 2025

FO° Exclusive: Chinese AI Startup DeepSeek Sparks Global Frenzy

February 14, 2025

FO° Exclusive: Donald Trump Launches an Explosive Imperial Presidency

February 10, 2025

FO° Talks: US Immigration Policy Under Donald Trump 2.0

February 09, 2025

FO° Exclusive: Europe Faces a Tough Year Ahead

February 08, 2025

FO° Exclusive: Unstable Africa Drives Refugees North

February 06, 2025

FO° Exclusive: Will the Global Economy Muddle Along, or Is There Trouble Ahead?

February 04, 2025

FO° Exclusive: The Russia–Ukraine War Could End

February 02, 2025

FO° Exclusive: The Turbulent Middle East Will Cool Down a Bit

January 30, 2025

FO° Exclusive: The New Science and Technology Race Is Heating Up

January 28, 2025

FO° Exclusive: A Turbulent Donald Trump Second Presidency

January 26, 2025

FO° Talks: Was the Great Jimmy Carter Really a Peacemaker?

January 17, 2025

FO° Exclusive: Why is the EU in Crisis? What Lies Ahead?

December 09, 2024

FO° Exclusive: Why Donald Trump Won Again and What Happens Now

December 07, 2024

FO° Exclusive: Rachel Reeves Delivers Important Post-Brexit Budget

November 07, 2024

FO° Exclusive: Make Sense of BRICS Summit in Russia

November 06, 2024

 

Fair Observer, 461 Harbor Blvd, Belmont, CA 94002, USA