The third US presidential debate took place last night, the 22nd of October, on the topic of foreign policy. Over the course of the campaign, the Romney camp has argued that unrest in the Middle East reflects the ‘unraveling of the Obama doctrine,’ while President Obama and his deputy, Joe Biden, have stressed how unlike in the past, when the US acted alone, the world is now united behind America – for example, in imposing strict sanctions on Iran.
So who is right about Obama’s effect on America’s global standing? The data offer something for both sides. While European and Latin American perceptions of the US have improved considerably since the administration of George W. Bush, in the Middle East and South Asia, attitudes have in fact deteriorated – from an already low level.
In Pakistan, only one in eight respondents now sees the US favourably, marking a record trough. Yet one must suspect this has less to do with Obama’s ‘weakness’, as the Romney campaign alleges, but rather, his surprising aggressiveness: including increased drone strikes, ‘kill lists’, and disregard for both national sovereignty, and international law, in the pursuit of al-Qaeda and its affiliates.
This infographic was originally published on FactBlink on October 23, 2012.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
Comment