Blog

The Morning After the Night Before

By
Theresa May news, Tories news, Tory news, Tory party news, Conservative Party news, Labour Party news, Labour news, Jeremy Corbyn news, Corbyn news, UK news

Theresa May © Number 10

June 09, 2017 10:37 EDT
Print

In Britain, the smack in the face the Tories have received confirms that the people have had enough.

This is the morning after the night before. It wasn’t quite the tsunami but a huge wave has just swept over British politics. It is also possible that there will be long-term impacts because of this not-so-surprising change in the political weather.

Under the UK system, the Conservatives needed 326 seats to form a majority in Parliament. They fell short by eight and were down 12 overall. Labour took 261, adding 31 to their total.

As of writing, the Conservatives are making deals with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), a right-wing, pro-Brexit, anti-abortion, otherwise meaningless party that is astute at negotiating with the Tories. Both will be rubbing their hands in glee at the thought of their roles in establishing the next government of the United Kingdom.

After all the attempts made by Tory newspapers, with the likes of The Daily MailThe Daily Telegraph, The Sun and every other Rupert Murdoch media incarnation, most people had Jeremy Corbyn barely able to hold on as Labour Party leader, let alone strengthening his position.

IN BRITAIN, THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN

In summer 2015, a defiant Corbyn was pursuing his first leadership challenge. As I witnessed hustings in Birmingham, I could see he had a genuine following among the young, the disaffected and the marginalized. These groups have been left behind by a resurgent, right-wing Tory Party whose interests remain as they have always done: themselves and their ilk.

The Tories generated a less than lackluster campaign with a manifesto put together shoddily. It was uncosted. More than that, it was uninspired. They believe that their Lynton Crosby-tested Facebook attack ads would swing the young. Their campaign focused on Corbyn, attempting to debunk the man and the myth. A lack of clarity or depth in Theresa May’s utterances meant that the Tory campaign was flailing from the start.

Too much emphasis was placed on projecting the power of May as a strong and stable leader, but she is far from that, as evidenced by her weary stage-managed performances or no-shows. The Conservatives went into this election full of bluster and confidence, but all that was shattered overnight.

Spin, distorted truths, exaggerated hyperbole, deals with populist rulers, selling arms to Middle East strongmen, giveaways to the city, and cozying up to big money were not enough to push aside the will of the ordinary man and woman on the streets of Britain today.

For the Tories, it has never been about the many but always the few who pursue their self-interests at the expense of everyone else, and the people have always seen through this.

Corbyn’s campaign, on the other hand, was decent, direct and unafraid to be honest and frank about the issues facing Britain today. He was relishing the opportunity to meet with the people, to engage with their ideas and to put forward a vision. Contrast this with May. “Ducking and diving,” her managed outings drew more scorn than following, evidenced by the fact that the Tories lost nearly all the seats that May was targeting from Labour.

A coalition of sorts might result in a reason for May to stay on as prime minister, although with a much-weakened government and an obliterated mandate. Going forward in negotiations with the European Union on such terms would be disastrous.

British politics is not out of the woods just yet. There is still a great deal of work needed to bring on board younger people on a more permanent basis. The smack in the face the Tories have received confirms that the British people have had enough. They want change. And they want it now. But while this recent battle has gained important ground, the greater fight rages on.

*[A version of this article was also featured on the author’s blog.]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Photo Credit: Number 10

Support Fair Observer

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.

In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.

We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a sustaining member.

Will you support FO’s journalism?

We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.

Donation Cycle

Donation Amount

The IRS recognizes Fair Observer as a section 501(c)(3) registered public charity (EIN: 46-4070943), enabling you to claim a tax deduction.

Make Sense of the World

Unique Insights from 2,500+ Contributors in 90+ Countries

Support Fair Observer

Support Fair Observer by becoming a sustaining member

Become a Member