Traditional values are holding back the new executive order of President Rodrigo Duterte to promote the use of contraception in the Philippines.
In 2012, a law was introduced to provide free contraception to the Philippine population of 100 million, many whom live in poverty.
This January, President Rodrigo Duterte signed an executive order to ensure access to reproductive health and sexual education, allowing everyone to obtain free contraceptives by 2018. Although his intentions are aimed at cutting poverty rates, he has met opposition from different quarters.
The Philippines is one of few countries to have seen a recent rise in adolescent births and high maternal mortality. Before the executive order was enforced, many women who could not afford birth control faced risky alternatives such as herbal poisons that are sold in Manila’s markets.
With high poverty rates, the driving force behind Duterte’s policy on contraception is to help the economic situation of the people. Many women have large numbers of children and are then left unable to afford the uptake of their families.
But the church and conservative congressmen have challenged president’s executive order. Bishop Broderick Pabillo is one of many public figures to oppose the ruling.
“We are discouraging contraception,” Pabillo said. “We’re encouraging natural family planning methods.”
While some in the Philippines do not believe in any form of contraception, many others have alternative views. Much of the population view contraception as a way to help women and families fight against poverty.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.
Photo Credit: Renato Borlaza
Support Fair Observer
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.
For more than 10 years, Fair Observer has been free, fair and independent. No billionaire owns us, no advertisers control us. We are a reader-supported nonprofit. Unlike many other publications, we keep our content free for readers regardless of where they live or whether they can afford to pay. We have no paywalls and no ads.
In the post-truth era of fake news, echo chambers and filter bubbles, we publish a plurality of perspectives from around the world. Anyone can publish with us, but everyone goes through a rigorous editorial process. So, you get fact-checked, well-reasoned content instead of noise.
We publish 2,500+ voices from 90+ countries. We also conduct education and training programs
on subjects ranging from digital media and journalism to writing and critical thinking. This
doesn’t come cheap. Servers, editors, trainers and web developers cost
money.
Please consider supporting us on a regular basis as a recurring donor or a
sustaining member.
Will you support FO’s journalism?
We rely on your support for our independence, diversity and quality.